All Posts By

Ed

Ed
In Recent News

Māori Council calls for police to address discrimination in cannabis arrests

Radio NZ News 2 November 2020
Our additional comment: Good call.
Also focusing on why Maori disproportionately use drugs would also be a good call.
Prevention and education matters.

The New Zealand Māori Council has called on the police to use their powers of discretion to stop sending Māori to prison for low-level drug offences now the cannabis referendum looks unlikely to pass.

Preliminary results for the cannabis referendum, announced on Friday, revealed 53 per cent voted against legalisation, with 46 per cent in favour.

Those campaigning yes to the cannabis referendum argued that fewer Māori would have a criminal record if it was legalised as they were six times more likely to get a custodial sentence for cannabis than non-Māori.

New Zealand Māori Council chief executive Matthew Tukaki said he knows many Māori would be disappointed with the failure of the cannabis referendum.

However, he said the disparity in the policing of cannabis that leads to more Māori being charged and convicted for cannabis offences than non-Māori could still be addressed.

“We should not delay in having a conversation – not about decriminalisation – but actually, reform of the criminal justice system more generally.

“Police already have powers of discretion and instead what we see is them continue to arrest mostly brown kids, and Māori and Pasifika kids, when it comes to possession of cannabis – that’s a low level form of offending that the police already have the ability to use discretion for but for some reason they’re not using it.
READ MORE: https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/m-ori-council-calls-police-address-discrimination-in-cannabis-arrests

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

Auckland Councillor Efeso Collins backs decriminalisation

Cannabis referendum: Auckland Councillor Efeso Collins of Say Nope to Dope camp backs decriminalisation
NZ Herald 30 October 2020
One of the campaigners against legalising cannabis says the referendum result shows a “clear mandate” for decriminalising marijuana.

Auckland Councillor Efeso Collins, who represents the Manukau ward, backed the Say Nope to Dope campaign, as he was not “completely convinced” there were enough safeguards to protect young people.

However, speaking at the campaign’s press conference, Collins said he was fully behind decriminalisation.

“I think the [legalisation] question was a bit extreme and ended up dividing New Zealanders.

“But I think this result shows there is a very clear mandate for decriminalisation. It is a good starting point, and what I think the referendum should have been more focused on.”

His comments come as Justice Minister Andrew Little said it would be “irresponsible” to reform drug laws, including legalising or decriminalising cannabis, after the preliminary referendum result.

That result showed 53.1 per cent voting “no” on legalising cannabis for personal recreational use, and 46.1 per cent voted “yes”.

The final result won’t be announced until next Friday, November 6, which will include 480,000-odd special votes.

But Little said about 70 per cent of those would have to have ticked “yes” to flip the result.

“The probability of that is so low as to be virtually non-existent.”

Collins, who is a member of the Labour Party, said that referendum result did give them that mandate, and he urged them to show “courage”, which they lacked sending the question to referendum in the first place.

“We have a broken system. Our young people are filling our prisons. A lot of people in my community who were in support thought this would fix that, but I’m not convinced.

“I think decriminalisation would be a good starting point.”

Other members of the Say Nope to Dope campaign, which was founded by Family First’s Bob McCoskrie, would not rule out supporting decriminalisation either.

McCoskrie and fellow campaigner Aaron Ironside said it was a “topic for another time”.

Although they would wait until the special votes had been counted, McCoskrie said they were “pretty stoked” with the preliminary result.

Ironside said young people might not applaud them, but they’d used their “freedom of choice” to stop them from being included in a “social experiment”.

“We can leave that to the Americans and Canadians,” he said.

He commended Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern for not stating her position before the referendum, and “leaving it to the people”.

Ironside said he believed New Zealanders ultimately backed them as they couldn’t imagine more cannabis being available would lead to less harm.

Their polling had shown a 10 per cent split in the vote in favour of no, so the result was slightly closer but still close to what they expected, he said.

After recent law changes around medicinal marijuana and the Misuse of Drugs Act, fewer people were being charged and more were being referred for health support, he said.

“Given enough time we might see those laws do what they are designed to do, but what was proposed was an overreach.”

Asked if he was okay for marijuana to continue funding gangs and not be taxed, he said he disagreed with the statement.

They agreed with better resourcing police to deal with that aspect, and increasing education campaigns, he said.

“We don’t want to create more addicts to help addicts.”

Asked about their use of cannabis gummy bears in their marketing – products that had been ruled out in the legislation – and claims of misinformation through the campaign, McCoskrie said they were simply “raising the spectre” of what had happened overseas and could happen here.

He also said “not a cent” of their funding had come from overseas, and they were conducting an independent audit, which they’d make public.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/cannabis-referendum-auckland-councillor-efeso-collins-of-say-nope-to-dope-camp-backs-decriminalisation/HNHEHXUKK2ITUSEG5ZQ7VNOWJY/

Calls for decriminalisation as legal cannabis looks unlikely
Radio NZ News 31 October 2020
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/calls-decriminalisation-legal-cannabis-looks-unlikely

Cannabis referendum: Greens not giving up on ‘yes’ vote yet
NewsHub 31 October 2020
Justice Minister Andrew Little told Checkpoint he felt that decriminalisation was a half-way stop that creates more problems than it solves.

“The Netherlands chief of police said they’ve had to turn a blind eye to the criminal elements supplying the coffee shops where people can use legally. It creates a huge complex mess that we wouldn’t want to replicate,” he said.

Little said the electorate has spoken, and the Government has no other proposals for drug law reform this term. He said voters have made a clear-cut decision, and the Government will respect that. Little said he believed legalising cannabis was a step too far for people.
READ MORE: https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/10/cannabis-referendum-greens-not-giving-up-on-yes-vote-yet.html

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

“We’re pretty stoked – SayNopeToDope campaign celebrates referendum result”

Chlöe Swarbrick optimistic in light of unsuccessful cannabis referendum
TVNZ One News 30 October 2020
Preliminary results for the recreational cannabis referendum showed 53.1% against and 46.1% in support. However, the preliminary result does not include special votes – estimated to make up 17% of the overall result that could impact the result.

On the other side, National’s Nick Smith celebrated the preliminary result, calling it a “victory for common sense”.

“New Zealanders have rightly concluded that legalising recreational cannabis would normalise it, make it more available, increase its use and cause more harm.

“New Zealanders have so far rejected legalisation of recreational cannabis and signalled opposition to the softening of drug crime,” he said.

“The way forward on drug policy is a firm approach on dealers and gangs to restrict supply, increased access to treatment and rehabilitation for users, expansion of specialised drug courts and improved education on drug harm.”

Family First’s Bob McCoskrie of the Say Nope to Dope campaign said he was “pretty stoked”.

“We’ll celebrate the win, we’re glad New Zealanders said nope to dope and understood the perceived benefits of legalisaiton were not greater than the harms that were going to come on society.”

“It’s been a hard-fought campaign on both sides. It’s good we can have these sorts of debates.”
READ MORE: https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/chl-e-swarbrick-optimistic-in-light-unsuccessful-cannabis-referendum

New Zealanders vote ‘yes’ to euthanasia, ‘no’ to legalising cannabis
The Sydney Morning Herald 30 October 2020
The push to legalise recreational cannabis and allow it to be grown and sold under controlled circumstances was defeated. The “yes” vote had 46.1 per cent support while 53.1 per cent of people voted “no”.

Aaron Ironside, the spokesman for the victorious Say Nope to Dope campaign, said New Zealanders had voted no because the country already had a relatively high level of marijuana usage and people were “reluctant to do anything to increase that”.

“Younger voters were more concerned about being able to use cannabis in peace. But older voters, even those who had tried it, realised and knew about the damage that it can cause so they swung towards no,” he said.

“It was a hard sell to say there will be 400 cannabis shops and people [would be] growing it in their backyards but usage would decrease. People didn’t want it to be a visible part of our world,” he said referring to figures suggested in a report to government.

New Zealand has a recent history of enacting social reforms, including the introduction of an emissions trading scheme back in 2008 and the legalisation of same-sex marriage in 2013.

But Ironside said that legalising cannabis was different as it would affect all citizens, regardless of whether they chose to use marijuana.

“Many other types of reform don’t affect anyone else, such as same-sex marriage. This reform affected everybody, it meant teenagers using cannabis; the use of cannabis when people drive or are at work. This would impinge on everyone’s lives, it wasn’t just about what happens in the privacy of your own home,” he said.
READ MORE: https://www.smh.com.au/world/oceania/nz-votes-yes-to-euthanasia-no-to-legalising-cannabis-20201030-p56a3m.html

Chlöe Swarbrick’s message to cannabis haters after failed referendum: ‘Well done – it still exists’
NewsHub 31 October 2020
Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick, a staunch advocate for legalising cannabis, has sarcastically congratulated her opponents on their apparent victory in the referendum.

Preliminary results suggest cannabis, which has been tried by the vast majority of Kiwi adults, will remain illegal – the ‘no’ camp ahead 53-46, with special votes yet to be counted.

Swarbrick, a rarity in Parliament as a vocal supporter of legalisation, took a shot at what she called the “perversely named” Say Nope to Dope campaign on Newshub Nation, a day after the results came in.

“I’m sorry guys, cannabis still exists,” she said, directly addressing the camera.

She also criticised fellow MPs who refused to reveal publicly how they planned to vote. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Justice Minister Andrew Little, whose name was on the Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, both voted for it – but wouldn’t admit that before the results were released.

In August Little said he was only 50/50 on whether he’d vote for legalisation, and Ardern always said she didn’t want to influence voters either way.

Swarbrick refused to criticise Ardern or Little directly – “I’m not going to give you a headline that doesn’t actually help the cause” – deciding to label “the majority of parliamentarians” hypocrites instead.
READ MORE: https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/10/chl-e-swarbrick-s-message-to-cannabis-haters-after-failed-referendum-well-done-it-still-exists.html

Cannabis referendum: Greens not giving up on ‘yes’ vote yet
NewsHub 31 October 2020
New Zealand Medical Association Dr Kate Baddock said the New Zealand public has spoken and the votes needed to be respected.

She said the NZMA position has been for decriminalisation as a social compromise, but she does not believe New Zealand is ready for legalisation.

“If New Zealanders had been ready for legalisation they would have voted for it … the way the vote has gone buys some time for the evidence to come out from those countries that have legalised cannabis.

“When the question recycles, which I’m sure it will, there will be more evidence to inform New Zealanders’ decision making.”

She said she agrees with the statement that Māori are disproportionately harmed by stricter laws, and New Zealand has an increased responsibility via the Treaty of Waitangi, and said that is part of why the NZMA supported decriminalisation.

She said there is room for expanding or consolidating decriminalisation.

In a statement, associate professor Chris WIlkins, who was on the Prime Minister’s chief science advisor’s expert panel on cannabis, said the narrow vote on the cannabis referendum reflected public uncertainty about key issues in the debate including:

  • whether the proposed regime would be effective at restricting young people’s access to cannabis
  • potential negative consequences for driving safety
  • fears the proposed regime would have a counterproductive effect on anti-smoking campaigns
  • whether the legal cannabis industry could be controlled in the long term (based on the experience with alcohol)
  • whether legalisation and normalisation of cannabis use may lead to rising use and dependency with related health and social costs
  • whether legalisation would really reduce the black market and the power of drug-selling gangs

“One important positive, which potentially comes from the result, is New Zealand will now have the opportunity to study cannabis legalisation reforms and outcomes currently underway overseas in US, Canada, and Uruguay over a number of years and learn important lessons about what policy settings and regulatory frameworks are effective,” Wilkins said.

But Justice Minister Andrew Little told Checkpoint he felt that decriminalisation was a half-way stop that creates more problems than it solves.

“The Netherlands chief of police said they’ve had to turn a blind eye to the criminal elements supplying the coffee shops where people can use legally.”

“It creates a huge complex mess that we wouldn’t want to replicate,” he said.

Little said the electorate has spoken, and the Government has no other proposals for drug law reform this term.

He said voters have made a clear-cut decision, and the Government will respect that.

Little said he believed legalising cannabis was a step too far for people.
READ MORE: https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/10/cannabis-referendum-greens-not-giving-up-on-yes-vote-yet.html

Referendum results live: NZ votes yes on euthanasia, no on cannabis legalisation
NZ Herald 30 October 2020
Bob McCoskrie of the Say Nope to Dope campaign told media the group was “pretty stoked” with the result on cannabis legalisation.

He said the campaign would need to wait until full results were revealed, but they were happy with the preliminary outcome.

He also credited the “yes” campaign for encouraging public debate.

“It’s good news for young people they are not going to be included in a social experiment, we can leave that to the Americans and Canadians,” a campaign spokesman said.

“This is the right result, we don’t expect young people to applaud us, but we have used our freedom for this.”

The group commended the Prime Minister for not stating her position ahead of the referendum, and “leaving it to the people”.
READ MORE: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/referendum-results-live-nz-votes-yes-on-euthanasia-no-on-cannabis-legalisation/LBKXYT2QB5IZLLCZJ7EVM6D4SY/

A generation-long battle for euthanasia wins, a one-shot bid to legalise cannabis fails
Stuff co.nz 30 October 2020
Aaron Ironside, of the Say No To Dope campaign, celebrated the “common sense” result, a message echoed by National Party drug reform spokesman Nick Smith.

“This is a victory for common sense … New Zealanders have rightly concluded that legalising recreational cannabis would normalise it, make it more available, increase its use and cause more harm,” Smith said in a statement.
READ MORE: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/123258552/a-generationlong-battle-for-euthanasia-wins-a-oneshot-bid-to-legalise-cannabis-fails

facebook_icon

 

 

Ed
In Recent News

Did misinformation sway cannabis referendum votes?

Stuff co.nz 1 November 2020
Our additional comment: The Yes campaign harped on that 80 per cent had tried cannabis – [those people] were annoyed to be included in the group that thought cannabis should be legalised. There wasn’t any narrative. Most tried and decided it is not something they wish to use.”
The No-campaign had been funded by “ordinary Kiwis”, he said. “We have not needed to raise any corporate money or overseas money. We didn’t enjoy having to continually rebuff accusations we were US funded. It simply wasn’t true. We didn’t receive a solitary cent.”

Say Nope to Dope spokesperson Aaron Ironside rejected the idea that campaign messages had misinformed the public.

“What [the Kia-Ora Dopy advertisement] was, was artistic,” he said.

“We had to do something that would move people’s hearts. The community hated the dairy becoming an alcohol shop. We simply posed the question: What if that iconic shop becomes a cannabis shop?

“If people didn’t like it becoming a booze shop, they are certainly not going to want it to become a dope shop. I don’t think there is anything misleading.

“I think people most delighted in the potential scandal of it were already yes voters … Much more people were swayed after discovering medicinal cannabis was legal and changes to the Misuse of Drugs Act. We think that’s what swayed people consolidating a No position.”

The no-campaigners had worked hard to be heard and believed it was a “David and Goliath” battle with only two registered referendum No campaigns and nine Yes campaigns, he said.

“Certainly, we were very aware both in terms of the number of messages and number of media pieces that seem to be in favour of the yes position… I think at the end of the day, lobbying either side only touches the periphery. I think most know what they think about these issues.”

The referendum showed it was difficult for a sub-culture to make cannabis use relatable to ordinary Kiwis, he said.

“The Yes campaign harped on that 80 per cent had tried cannabis – [those people] were annoyed to be included in the group that thought cannabis should be legalised. There wasn’t any narrative. Most tried and decided it is not something they wish to use.”

The No-campaign had been funded by “ordinary Kiwis”, he said.

“We have not needed to raise any corporate money or overseas money.

“We didn’t enjoy having to continually rebuff accusations we were US funded. It simply wasn’t true. We didn’t receive a solitary cent.”
READ MORE: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/cannabis-referendum/123239460/did-misinformation-sway-cannabis-referendum-votes

signup-rollKeep up with family issues in NZ.
Receive our weekly emails direct to your Inbox.
Ed
In Recent News

Heather Du Plessis-Allan: It’s not Jacinda Ardern’s fault that NZ voted against legalising cannabis

NZ Herald 1 November 2020
Our additional comment: “While the “no” vote swung into action in an impressive way, the “yes” vote was AWOL,“ 👍😄

It isn’t Jacinda Ardern’s fault that the cannabis legalisation referendum failed.

Plenty of disappointed pro-legalisation voters are unfairly blaming the Prime Minister. They believe the vote might’ve passed if only she had declared earlier how she’d voted, rather than keeping it a secret until after the results were announced.

As soon as Ardern finally admitted to a “yes” vote, social media filled with messages accusing her of “zero leadership on this issue”, wishing she had “mentioned BEFORE the election”, saying she “was unwilling to spend a cent of her political capital to get it across the line” and arguing that it “could have made a difference to the results if she had told us beforehand”.

It might’ve made a difference, it might not have. Maybe Ardern could have led a few undecideds to follow her into the “yes” camp through her moral leadership.

Maybe it would’ve backfired in the way Sir John Key’s preference in the flag referendum is thought to have, with people voting to oppose his preference just because it was his preference.

Who’s to know?

While the “no” vote swung into action in an impressive way, the “yes” vote was AWOL, bar Chloe Swarbrick’s hard work and frequent media appearances. Good as Chloe is, one MP is not enough against an organised campaign of opposition.
READ MORE: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/heather-du-plessis-allan-its-not-jacinda-arderns-fault-that-nz-voted-against-legalising-cannabis/CZ2XAKX2QITT5IHOL3WBMLLQ5Y/

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

Cannabis referendum: Despite what Chloe Swarbrick says the no vote was never about eliminating weed

NewsHub 31 October 2020
Our additional comment: “ It was never about eliminating cannabis though. No one who voted no thought it would go away. They were just not sure legalising something that was illegal was the answer. They say the voter is never wrong and maybe Swarbrick should have a little more respect for the no vote.”

OPINION: Just to start out I voted yes to legalising cannabis. It was very much a last-minute decision as I hadn’t made my mind up as I entered the polling booth.

I ticked yes as I guess subconsciously I thought it was better to legalise something many, many Kiwis use.

But I still remain unconvinced by the legalise cannabis arguments, led mainly by Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick, who gave an impassioned interview on the Newshub Nation on Saturday morning.

One of the key arguments of the legalise campaign and one Swarbrick reiterated on the programme was it will be easier to regulate cannabis if it is legal.

I am not convinced we can regulate cannabis properly when we clearly can’t regulate alcohol, despite thinking we can.

I don’t smoke dope, I don’t like it, it renders me into a comatose state that I don’t really enjoy. I do know a lot of people who do and I didn’t buy the supply argument that Swarbrick again alluded to on the Nation.
READ MORE: https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2020/10/cannabis-referendum-despite-what-chloe-swarbrick-says-the-no-vote-was-never-about-eliminating-weed.html

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

Concern ‘reefer-endum’ will result in more workers trying to cheat drug tests

Stuff co.nz 29 October 2020
Our additional comment: “employers were worried about what a law change could mean for workplace safety, with hundreds of people already trying to cheat the system every year using fully legal products.”

Fake pee and THC-masking pill sales are expected to skyrocket as cannabis legalisation potentially looms on the horizon.

The public voted this year on whether they think recreational use of cannabis should be legal, with preliminary results due out on Friday.

The final result will be released on November 6.

But one workplace drug testing service said employers were worried about what a law change could mean for workplace safety, with hundreds of people already trying to cheat the system every year using fully legal products.

One example of what is on the market is the ‘Whizzard’ set, which includes synthetic urine, a bladder bag, heating pads to bring the liquid to body temperature, and even a prosthetic penis that “helps you out when you are trying to take a test under a watchful eye”.
READ MORE: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/cannabis-referendum/123230744/concern-reeferendum-will-result-in-more-workers-trying-to-cheat-drug-tests

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

Kate Hawkesby: I can’t predict which way the cannabis referendum will go

NewsTalk ZB 29 October 2020
Our additional comment: A perfect summary from someone IN the media…
“I’ll be disappointed if it’s a yes vote that wins. I’ll be disappointed because of the amount of misinformation that was spread like wildfire, the prominence of the pro-campaigners in mainstream media, the lack of balance. I don’t feel like it was a fair fight… There seemed to be an agenda early on to promote cannabis legalisation as a good thing – and anyone railing against it was labelled as some kind of moral crusader backing the wrong horse… I am crossing my fingers and toes that New Zealanders saw through the propaganda, and ticked no.”
So are we!

So tomorrow we get the preliminary results of the referendums.

If we believe the polls, Cannabis legalisation won’t pass and End of Life choice will.

But can we believe the polls?

And which polls? The main ones had support for the Cannabis referendum dropping, and opposition to it rising.

But then the week before we went to vote, Helen Clark and the Drug Foundation produced their own poll showing support for cannabis legalisation was up, it was ahead, that it was close, but that it would indeed get through.

So who do we believe?

Well after the election .. it’s anyone’s guess. I didn’t see Chloe Swarbrick winning Auckland central either. Many didn’t. Even she admitted there’s value in being under estimated. So have we under estimated support for cannabis legalisation? And has the swing left in not just Auckland Central but across the country, indicated a yes vote may indeed clinch it?

I’ll be disappointed if it’s a yes vote that wins. I’ll be disappointed because of the amount of misinformation that was spread like wildfire, the prominence of the pro-campaigners in mainstream media, the lack of balance. I don’t feel like it was a fair fight.
READ MORE: https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/early-edition/opinion/kate-hawkesby-i-cant-pick-how-the-cannabis-referendum-will-go-tomorrow/

signup-rollKeep up with family issues in NZ.
Receive our weekly emails direct to your Inbox.
Ed
In Recent News

Do You Have the Heart for Marijuana?

The New York Times 26 October 2020
Our additional comment: “marijuana is becoming increasingly potent, and smoking marijuana carries many of the same cardiovascular health hazards as smoking tobacco.” Edible forms of marijuana have also been implicated as a possible cause of a heart attack, especially when high doses of the active ingredient THC are consumed.”

Do you have the heart to safely smoke pot? Maybe not, a growing body of medical reports suggests.

Currently, increased smoking of marijuana in public, even in cities like New York where recreational use remains illegal (though no longer prosecuted), has reinforced a popular belief that this practice is safe, even health-promoting.

“Many people think that they have a free pass to smoke marijuana,” Dr. Salomeh Keyhani, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, told me. “I even heard a suggestion on public radio that tobacco companies should switch to marijuana because then they’d be selling life instead of selling death.”

But if you already are a regular user of recreational marijuana or about to become one, it would be wise to consider medical evidence that contradicts this view, especially for people with underlying cardiovascular diseases.

Compared with tobacco, marijuana smoking causes a fivefold greater impairment of the blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity, Dr. Keyhani and colleagues reported.
READ MORE: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/26/well/live/marijuana-heart-health-cardiovascular-risks.html

facebook_icon

Ed
In Recent News

The True Cost of Marijuana: A Colorado Town That Went All-In

The Epoch Times 27 October 2020
Our additional comment: An excellent summary of what happened to Pueblo in Colorado after legalisation. Disturbing….
“Since legalization in Colorado, Randall and Roberts have seen an increase in all drug use, not just marijuana. Methamphetamine use is up 143%, opiates are up by 10%, and cannabis is up by 57%, according to data from the ER drug screens over the past seven years. “If you pump a community full of drugs, you’re going to have to expect everything that’s associated with them. You’re going to have to expect the crime, addiction.””

It’s a common story across America: A city loses its main employer, usually a manufacturing company with well-paying, blue-collar jobs (that often go to China). The city’s economy crumbles, and those who can move out, do.

Decades later, and looking peeling-paint tired, the city hasn’t managed to recover, but drugs have found a permanent home.

In Pueblo, Colorado, the manufacturer was a steel plant beleaguered by a market crash in the 1980s and worker strikes in the 1990s. And one drug was given a red-carpet welcome.

For years, Pueblo has been looking for industries to revive its economy, and when recreational marijuana was legalized for retail sale in Colorado in 2014, many saw it as the answer. More people would be employed and the tax money would go to schools and infrastructure.

The county commissioner at the time, Sal Pace, went all-in on the industry, promoting Pueblo as the “Napa Valley of cannabis.” Pueblo is situated 100 miles south of Denver, with a population of around 160,000 people.

Marijuana grow operations and dispensaries sprung up quickly and now employ around 2,000 people, Pace told Colorado Politics in September. According to employment website Indeed.com, the majority of dispensary jobs in Colorado pay $12 to $15 per hour.
READ MORE: https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-true-cost-of-marijuana-a-colorado-town-that-went-all-in_3546091.html

facebook_icon